102 lines
4.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
102 lines
4.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK
|
||
|
|
||
|
***********************************
|
||
|
Project Testing and Release Process
|
||
|
***********************************
|
||
|
|
||
|
Day to Day Development
|
||
|
======================
|
||
|
|
||
|
This section details how the project tests changes, through automation
|
||
|
on the Autobuilder or with the assistance of QA teams, through to making
|
||
|
releases.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The project aims to test changes against our test matrix before those
|
||
|
changes are merged into the master branch. As such, changes are queued
|
||
|
up in batches either in the ``master-next`` branch in the main trees, or
|
||
|
in user trees such as ``ross/mut`` in ``poky-contrib`` (Ross Burton
|
||
|
helps review and test patches and this is his testing tree).
|
||
|
|
||
|
We have two broad categories of test builds, including "full" and
|
||
|
"quick". On the Autobuilder, these can be seen as "a-quick" and
|
||
|
"a-full", simply for ease of sorting in the UI. Use our Autobuilder
|
||
|
console view to see where me manage most test-related items, available
|
||
|
at: :yocto_ab:`/typhoon/#/console`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Builds are triggered manually when the test branches are ready. The
|
||
|
builds are monitored by the SWAT team. For additional information, see
|
||
|
:yocto_wiki:`/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team`.
|
||
|
If successful, the changes would usually be merged to the ``master``
|
||
|
branch. If not successful, someone would respond to the changes on the
|
||
|
mailing list explaining that there was a failure in testing. The choice
|
||
|
of quick or full would depend on the type of changes and the speed with
|
||
|
which the result was required.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Autobuilder does build the ``master`` branch once daily for several
|
||
|
reasons, in particular, to ensure the current ``master`` branch does
|
||
|
build, but also to keep ``yocto-testresults``
|
||
|
(:yocto_git:`/yocto-testresults/`),
|
||
|
buildhistory
|
||
|
(:yocto_git:`/poky-buildhistory/`), and
|
||
|
our sstate up to date. On the weekend, there is a master-next build
|
||
|
instead to ensure the test results are updated for the less frequently
|
||
|
run targets.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Performance builds (buildperf-\* targets in the console) are triggered
|
||
|
separately every six hours and automatically push their results to the
|
||
|
buildstats repository at:
|
||
|
:yocto_git:`/yocto-buildstats/`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The 'quick' targets have been selected to be the ones which catch the
|
||
|
most failures or give the most valuable data. We run 'fast' ptests in
|
||
|
this case for example but not the ones which take a long time. The quick
|
||
|
target doesn't include \*-lsb builds for all architectures, some world
|
||
|
builds and doesn't trigger performance tests or ltp testing. The full
|
||
|
build includes all these things and is slower but more comprehensive.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Release Builds
|
||
|
==============
|
||
|
|
||
|
The project typically has two major releases a year with a six month
|
||
|
cadence in April and October. Between these there would be a number of
|
||
|
milestone releases (usually four) with the final one being stabilization
|
||
|
only along with point releases of our stable branches.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The build and release process for these project releases is similar to
|
||
|
that in :ref:`test-manual/test-process:day to day development`, in that the
|
||
|
a-full target of the Autobuilder is used but in addition the form is
|
||
|
configured to generate and publish artifacts and the milestone number,
|
||
|
version, release candidate number and other information is entered. The
|
||
|
box to "generate an email to QA"is also checked.
|
||
|
|
||
|
When the build completes, an email is sent out using the send-qa-email
|
||
|
script in the ``yocto-autobuilder-helper`` repository to the list of
|
||
|
people configured for that release. Release builds are placed into a
|
||
|
directory in https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases on the
|
||
|
Autobuilder which is included in the email. The process from here is
|
||
|
more manual and control is effectively passed to release engineering.
|
||
|
The next steps include:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- QA teams respond to the email saying which tests they plan to run and
|
||
|
when the results will be available.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- QA teams run their tests and share their results in the yocto-
|
||
|
testresults-contrib repository, along with a summary of their
|
||
|
findings.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Release engineering prepare the release as per their process.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Test results from the QA teams are included into the release in
|
||
|
separate directories and also uploaded to the yocto-testresults
|
||
|
repository alongside the other test results for the given revision.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- The QA report in the final release is regenerated using resulttool to
|
||
|
include the new test results and the test summaries from the teams
|
||
|
(as headers to the generated report).
|
||
|
|
||
|
- The release is checked against the release checklist and release
|
||
|
readiness criteria.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- A final decision on whether to release is made by the YP TSC who have
|
||
|
final oversight on release readiness.
|